|
|
1. P1
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
1. P2
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
1. P3
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
1. P4
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
1. P5
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
1. P6
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
1. P7
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
1. P8
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
1. P9
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
1. P10
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
|
Session #40 – November 17, 1984
Gloria’s Circle
Present: Jean Chisholm, LaMar and RetaMae Bell, Richard and Mary White, Larry
and Eileen Horton, Bonnie Wisz, Peggy Muldoon, Ida Nevala, Owen and
Maxine Cramer
Sheariam: Good evening students and friends. Again we come together to study
once more. How have you fared since last we met?
Owen: Well, we just had a study session, and I suppose you were probably
observing it. There are difficulties and questions, and I’m sure some problem with the
expanse of time since when we were studying more intently.
Sheariam: We are indeed gratified to see your difficulties, for then it means to us
that you are striving to understand. If this came easily to you, you would not need us
or the teachings. Man would have evolved to the condition past earth. All we ask of
you is that you try. That makes our efforts worthy. So let us then entertain some of
the questions which you have.
Richard: I have a question regarding working on the affirmations. We did some of
that when we were together last time, so we were talking this evening especially about
questions we had in regard to forming an affirmation. We were working with Tzaphkiel,
for instance, and trying to understand how the Law, the Principle and the Attribute
worked together.
In making an affirmation, would we want to use a definite sequence such as the
word “Illusion” which is the Law, followed by the word “Balance” which is the Principle,
followed by the word “Understanding” or “Knowing” which is the Attribute. Would this
be a good rule-of-thumb to use for any of the nine different laws?
Sheariam: Yes, that procedure would be perfectly acceptable. One of the
struggles you are having is in putting words together without adequate sentence
structure as you are used to doing. Do not allow this to prohibit your efforts.
Inasmuch as your language would require many words in order to be specific, these
words were chosen as the best to express the essence of what is intended to be
conveyed. Thus you can use the Law, the Principle and the Attribute as an
affirmation, even though it is not structurally sound to your ears.
If you feel more comfortable with a structured sentence, then by all means
prepare such a structured sentence. For what is important is that you bring your
consciousness into alignment with the end result which you desire as a result of
making the affirmation.
Richard: That clarifies quite a bit for me, and I think for most of us, because we
were trying to pick out which ideas, even so far as the Attributes of the Archangels
themselves. In the case we had “waking dreams” and wondered how important that was,
and the idea of “thrones” for the Order of angels. We were trying to decide which words
and which items were important for the purpose. And then we tumbled onto using the
Law, followed by the Principle, followed by the Attribute, and maybe that was the best
way to approach it in most cases.
Sheariam: For affirmations, do restrain yourselves to the use of Laws, the
Principles and the Attributes. The other language used in connection with the
Archangels and the Angels was an attempt to acquaint you with the function or the
power of that particular manifestation or characterization. (Richard: I think that
puts it in a lot better perspective for us. Thank you.)
LaMar: Another question we were debating is: How broad are the Archangels in
their functions? For instance, we decided on trying to create an affirmation to be able to
understand these things better when we study. “Sandalphon” seemed to be the choice.
Would “Tzaphkiel”, for instance, have been a good choice there? Is it necessary to find
exactly the right one, or are those energies overlapping?
Sheariam: That is very perceptive. They do, indeed, overlap. It depends upon
what understanding you seek. If, for instance, you wish to have something revealed
to you which previously has been hidden from you, you would go with the Law of
Illusion. However, if there is some resource which you would wish to be made
available to you, you might ask for “Sandalphon”, because as you harmonize, you
become one with the thing which you seek, and thus nothing can stand between you.
If you want to widen or deepen your understanding, you might seek to find higher
realms, such as the beauty of something. You see there you would work through
that Attribute, through those laws. (LaMar: Through Haniel?) For abundance, yes.
But you would go then to another for beauty. (Raphael?)
Eileen: Which one of the Archangels would be best to invoke for healing?
(Again, any of them. For instance, in a healing process already begun, you might ask
for abundance of healing through “Haniel”. But if the healing had not yet been
instituted, you might seek assistance through “Sandalphon”. Or if you wished the
healing process to be finished and complete, you might seek assistance from
“Raphael”.)
LaMar: This is extremely helpful as far as I am concerned. This is the thing which
has been holding me back from doing this work, because I simply didn’t have enough
understanding of the things that you were just saying there. I really feel that I was doing
an adequate job. (But being a creature in a realm of form, if you do not struggle first,
you do not develop the questions. If we give you answers without questions, you do
not then understand.) Thank you, very much.
Richard: I have a question. Speaking of “Haniel” coming under the Law of
Relinquishment, you’ve just been talking about abundance which is the description of
Haniel’s characteristic. I have great trouble in seeing how abundance comes from the
Law of Relinquishment. (When you relinquish all, you give it to the universe. Then all
the universe is yours. There is no greater abundance. As you withhold from the
universe, you restrict your own supply.)
Bonnie: Could we make up an affirmation for abundance? (Would you like to
begin?)
Richard: Can we use that rule of thumb: Law followed by Principle, followed by
Attribute? (Try it.)
Bonnie:I’m trying to figure out how to use “Purpose” in that.” (Use “purposes”
as a verb. “Purposes”.)
Richard: To bring it about. (Several tries) Can Attribute which is “mastery of life”
be “mastery of self”? (That is what is purposed.) What are we relinquishing? (More
discussion.)
Maxine: Relinquishment purposes mastery. So I suppose what you need, if you
want abundance, you need to relinquish some things that you have that are unnecessary.
Would that be it?(You are only beginning. “Relinquishment purposes mastery.”
Think about it. Divine Relinquishment. You as an entity have been relinquished,
released, to find your own mastery. There is Divine Purpose in that. When you
relinquish a problem to the Universal Solvent, you are purposing mastery for
yourself, are you not? Is that not what you wish?)
Richard: Relinquishment purposes Mastery. (If you feel more comfortable by
preceding the Law, or something in your words that means that law, with the word
“I”, then use it. You might affirm “I relinquish my life to the Universe, and
abundance is mine.)
Bonnie: I like that one.
LaMar: I do, too. I understand that. “Relinquishment purposes Mastery” doesn’t
mean much to me at this point.
Eileen: Is it possible to have a rapport or affinity for some particular archangel
and feel comfortable calling on that person for different purposes. (Yes, indeed, that is
most likely so.) I feel an affinity for Raphael. Perhaps that is because I am an artist, but I
find myself calling on Raphael quite often.
Richard: What affirmation do you use?
Eileen: It usually pertains to my art work. The affirmation would be personal with me
because of the beauty and the art work. You see the idea of beauty ties in with the work
I’m doing. I probably wasn’t using the right affirmation. (Discussion of who will work up
affirmations for whom.)
RetaMae: Sheariam, we would not be offending any of the archangels, would we, by
not using them? (The Archangels do not take offense. The purpose of the affirmation
is to bring your consciousness into alignment with the Archangel. So it behooves you
to make an affirmation that will perform that function for you. The affirmations
become more powerful as they incorporate the words given you for the Laws,
Principles and Attributes.)
Bonnie: The Archangels are in us. (They are characterizations of the Divine
which have manifest in you.)
LaMar: The light comes on every so dimly. (That gratifies us greatly.) (laughter)
Richard: Let’s hope it gets brighter.
LaMar: I’m in hopes it will get much brighter.
Bonnie: Oh, then let’s do an affirmation for brightness. (Suggestions to do our own
affirmations and go to lesson.)
Peggy: Can we use these Archangels in getting something to take place, like if
you want something to happen in the future, like a few months. Could you use these
Archangels for that? (Of course. Remember that you have a Law of Process. In your
universe, time exists. Everything takes time to manifest. You will recall Silverthistle
has told you that we in the Spirit-physical are also subject to time, not your time,
but our time. We have points of reference by which we can judge process even as
you have points of reference to judge how much time transpires.)
Richard: So your life is sequential? (Yes.)
Larry: I have a question. Could you create an unknown archangel and use it for
your own benefit instead of the ones that have been given to us? (In all likelihood,
anyone that you would choose, whatever you might design within your own mind,
would be a part of one already given.) We created one many years ago which seemed
to give good response. Of all things, we used the person, a “Deadready-Jackson”, who,
when called on, would bring protection or would lead or guide as we asked for it. Now
that was created many years ago: Deadready Jackson. A few of us back in about 1943-4.
Sheariam: Remember that the armies of angels are individuals in certain
conditions, all of whom have names as well. And, as has been given by us, we take on
names which attend our intentions. As you call forth some manifestation of the
universe, such as protection, you give it a name. It does not matter what you call it.
It is your consciousness that calls it forth.
The idea behind the names of the Archangels as we have given you is that
these are the sounds forming together to deliver the essence of the representation or
the characterization. These are names which have been used for many centuries,
and thus there is a general consciousness within mankind that responds to these
names when spoken.
Eileen: Something that has been flitting through my mind has been about the
middleman, here, you might say. It’s somewhat like the Catholic faith praying to a saint.
Why can’t we go direct to the source? Why do we have to go through an Archangel?
(You are going directly to the source. None of the Archangels are separate from
God, but part of the Divine Character. You are simply appealing to that particular
aspect of the Divine Source.)
Jean: Would an affirmation for Raphael be “Divine Process makes all beautiful?
(Perfect!)
Sheariam: As Judith proceeds with the hierarchy, you will better understand
what lies between you and the ultimate Divine Source, and why the creation of
saints and intermediaries and intercessors. In fact, Silverthistle’s message for you
tonight has to do with this to some degree.
Do you have any further questions with regard to this current discussion?
(Peggy: Is it true that everything happens at its own right time?) That is Ratziel.)
***Jean: I’m not satisfied with my affirmation for Michael. Divine
Dominance, and then, Appropriates, but that doesn’t fit well. (Several suggestions.)
(What are you attempting to achieve? Michael has to do with you as an individual
forming the vessel through which the Divine flows. Thus, as you take dominance
over your life, you appropriate the substance of life and control your own destiny.
As you relinquish all to the Universe, Divine Dominance appropriates whatever is
necessary to flow through you to complete your life.) That’s a different meaning.
Divine Dominance fulfills my emotional needs? (Yes.)
Eileen: Would it be effective to make an affirmation for another person? (No,
unless that person asks you to do so.)
Peggy: We could use the law of knowledge that they could be aware of the
affirmation that they need. (You are still interfering.)
Eileen: We talk about praying for another person, and that seems to be effective.
(How do you know what the consequences of your act are?) From what we hear. It
seems that prayer is very effective. (It can be effective negatively also.)
Owen: But when we invite those for whom we have concern to come into our
circle and partake of the energy that we have generated here, is the distinction that they
are invited to come? They can if they like. (Precisely.) Can we do something like that in
the way of prayer? We can invite them to be aware of something?
Richard: Hold them in the Divine Light. (You can do that.)
RetaMae: And then let go. (Very good. Most human prayer is a petition for
something to happen.)
LaMar: Isn’t that a positive approach? How would it ever turn out to be a negative
reaction? (You pray for someone to get well, and you have in your mind the debility.
You are actually empowering the debility.)
Richard: It’s hard to think of someone who is ill without thinking of them with
illness.
Larry: A lot of people are asking for help, but they don’t know how to ask. And here
you’re trying to give positive strokes to the fact that they’re just not attuned to ask in the
proper way that we would say is the proper way to ask for help.
LaMar: It has been my belief an understanding that if we don’t even know what
the problem is, we’re better off. (That is true.) Then we simply see them as whole, as
one with God, etc., and we are not then tempted to focus on the problem, but rather to
totally ignore the problem and bring them in line with the creator.
Eileen: Focus on the way it should be: their wholeness. (But when you give
thought to the fact that you are asking for wholeness because someone is ill, or
because they have personal problems, you are making a judgment.)
Richard: So you should simply see them as whole, and that’s it, all in God’s
perfection. (That is correct.) Nothing more.
Peggy: Does this apply to your loved ones getting the right employment they need
to survive? (Yes, because their choices have brought them to whatever condition they
are entertaining. And it is not for you to make choices for another.)
Eileen: Then the safe thing to do would be just to send a person love. (That is the
very best. Thus the injunction: “Love thy neighbor as thyself.”) And let them work
out their own problems. (Yes.) But you’re be sending them positive energy that way to
help them work out their own problems.
Richard: Keep it simple. Keep it perfect.
LaMar: On this thing that Larry and Richard were talking about a few minutes
ago. Ambrose Worrel tells a story about a little girl he was helping. On the first evening
he was working on her healing, nothing seemed to be happening. There seemed to be
something blocking the energy that should be coming to the girl. So, he questioned the
parents. They, knowing that he was going to work about that time, were trying to help.
Only problem was the parents were too close to the situation, and they were focusing on
the problem and they were just blocking what he was doing. Then he convinced them to
get out of the way, to leave it alone, and let him take care of it. The healing came
through. And the next time they went to the hospital, the little girl was sitting up cutting
out dolls. The parents had been too close and were focusing on the problem.
Larry: That’s hard to realize that could exist, because don’t we all have a
tendency to want to give more to somebody else than to yourself, especially when you
can help, mostly on healing. When they need healing or help, we want to give more to
them than we would give to our own self.
Jean: Can you give us an example of the words we should use to send love or
help to someone? (What is the matter with the word “love”? Can you not say, “I love
you”? Is that not an adequate affirmation?) It seems too easy. (This is one of the
failings of earthly life. You lose sight of economy.)
LaMar: I would say that it would be appropriate if each one of us would make an
affirmation for the various things we would like, so that we could give them next time
and see what successes and failures we may have had. (That is an excellent plan.)
Jean: This seems trivial, but I always say, “There is a parking place near”. But
that is an affirmation, isn’t it? (And Haniel’s abundance provides.) And I’m amazed
that it’s always there.
Larry: Getting back to what Richard and LaMar said, to check yourself out to see
if there was any good or bad, the one that I have liked that about the time I think of
someone, they begin to make improvement or things came about in a pleasant or peaceful
way for them. (Remember that at any time you command a situation either by saying
“This will happen to them at a particular time” you are involving yourselves in their
responsibility. This outcome might be suitable to you at this moment, but in the
overall picture you may at sometime regret having exercised that much control over
another’s destiny.)
Jean: Now I’m confused. When does helping get mixed up with control? (When
the person has not asked you.)
Eileen: What if you know that a person wants a particular thing, and you go ahead
and make your affirmation? (That again is a judgment on your part. If that person
has not asked you to intercede for him, you are standing in his place of authority.)
Even if you’ve heard them expressed? (If that person has expressed that to you, then it
perhaps could be an implied request.)
Larry: We have a healing circle, and you know someone that needs your help,
and you place their name in the pool for some energy to be sent there. They didn’t request
that. (You are not placing them in the pool to send energy to them. You announce
their name to call their consciousness. You offer them an invitation only.)
Eileen: In other words, this is reaching them on a different level than their
conscious level. (On the intuitive level, yes.)
Owen: There was one instance when we did that, and you mentioned that a
number of those that had been called had not come. (Not everyone wants your help. Not
everyone wants to be healed. They have created that situation for a purpose, and
until the purpose is served, they will not accept the healing.)
Bonnie: If a person were to simply say, “Cross your fingers for me”, would that be
enough? (That’s a request for help.)
Jean: So the request for help doesn’t have to be made in words. It can be a look?
(Yes.)
Eileen: Could it be your intuitive feeling that they are in need of help, and by
confiding in you they are asking? (Usually a confidence is a plea for help, yes. But be
careful at the intuitive level, because ego will lead you astray.)
Jean: When a child is acting out, and you can know that this acting out generally
means that they need help, is the acting out a way of asking for help? (Remember, as
given before, there are primary applications of responsibility when it comes to
children. The parents are first and foremost responsible. When a grandparent steps
into the parents’ place without the parents’ request, you are usurping the parents’
responsibility.)
But what if the parents have asked for help? (Then you have been asked.) Then
the child doesn’t have to ask? (No.)
Peggy: If they say, “Say a prayer for me”, that would be asking, wouldn’t it? (If
they ask you to pray for them, they are asking for help.)
Jean: And sometimes they just say, “remember me”. That is asking for help?
(Yes.) (Others suggested such as “keep the good thought”, “send me your energies”.
These received “yes” from Sheariam.)
RetaMae: When our own child has become an adult? (Then that authority has
transferred. (Questions as to when.) (Chronological age does not always answer the
question.)
Peggy: I was told once that you are responsible for the child until the age of
twelve, then they do their own thinking. (That is rather arbitrary.) (Comments about
differences in maturity between children.)
Jean: What are we doing when we say, “God be with you” or “God bless you”?
(The right thing.) (Laughter.)
Richard: That’s putting them in God’s light. (Discussion of other ways of sending
love: by touching, by giving a compassionate look, or by listening, by stopping them, and
these may be healing.)
Sheariam: Are you ready then?
Silverthistle: Good evening. I will not take much of your time tonight, but I would
refer you to John 14. Let us look back for a moment to what I gave you earlier
about the name “Jesus.” That is in truth Jeshua which is the Active Discriminating
Power manifest in Spirit. Jeshua represents a condition of mankind in his evolution
when it is necessary for him to use and be used by Divine Discrimination.
It is man in his evolution before the dispensation of his own intuitive
capacities. You will be aware that the life of Jeshua was thirty-three years. That is
between the sixth and seventh octave of man who is five. Numerologically, five times
six is thirty, and five times seven is thirty-five, so the length of this life time gives the
meaning insofar as the evolution of human consciousness.
Now in John 1:15, Jeshua is telling his disciples about his imminent
departure. The disciples, themselves, represent powers of human expression. So, this
manifestation of Divine Active Discrimination is leaving, or being supplanted by, the
twelve powers which you have and which you use at an intuitive level.
And so Jeshua is quoted as saying, ‘If ye love me, keep my commandments.
And I shall pray to the Father, and he shall give another comforter, that he shall
abide with you always. When the spirit of truth which the world cannot receive, for
it sees him not and knows him not, for he dwells with you and shall be in you.”
Now when Jeshua is saying “If ye love me”, refer back to the lessons given by
Judith and Sheariam. What is the Law of Love and Mercy? (Maxine: The Law of
Process.) Very good. At least I received an answer. What is the Law? (Maxine: The
law of love and mercy is the Law of Reproduction.) Thus Jeshua is saying, “If you
would reproduce me in your lives, keep my commandments.” And what are those
commandments? (Love one another.) Reproduce, reproduce. It is bidden in the laws
that you be fruitful and multiply.
And then Jeshua said, “I shall pray to the Father”. He is saying that the
Active Discriminating Power of the Divine I Am is your intercessor. “And he shall
give you another comforter.” This is not the comforter spoken of in the Beatitudes.
In the Beatitudes that Comforter is the Divine Consoler, is outside, in a manner of
speaking. It comes into you through Divine Spirit upon being called. But this
comforter that is promised through the intercession of the Discriminating Power is
the comforter of strengthening and is with you always.
It is now part of your consciousness, is already a part given you in place of
the externalized Active Discriminative Power of The Divine I Am. You now are
endowed with the strength of the personal I Am. For the I Am abides with you
always. This is the achievement of mankind in reaching true self-consciousness as a
spiritual being.
Now the “Spirit of Truth” of which Jeshua speaks is a mistranslation of the
original intention. It is occultly the exhalation of God’s breath which carried the
moisture of the Divine Dew. And those of you in the consciousness of the personal I
Am are moistened, fertilized, moved by the Divine Dew in a very special way which
the world cannot receive, because the world is that condition of man in which the I
Am is not revealed.
“It sees him not. It knows him not.” When you are of the world, in the world,
you lost that sense of divine identity. That is the sacrifice of the Jeshua in leaving the
disciples. Even as you spoke earlier about caring and helping and doing for another,
the time has come in human evolution that man must do for himself. He must
achieve mastery for himself. “For he dwells in you and shall be in you.” And so ends
my story for this night. (Expressions of thanks.) It is my greatest pleasure.
Owen: Silverthistle, you had started last spring on the parables. I’m not sure this
qualifies as a parable, but will you be continuing with the parables? (Part of the time,
yes.) Another question. We’ve prepared a rough draft of a letter to a television channel
here suggesting that we think it might be appropriate for them to invite Gloria to be on
their program to discuss the book, Eight Keys to Cosmic Consciousness. Do you have a
feeling about this proposal?
(We would be greatly excited and most delighted, but we do not expect that
your plea will be confirmed.)
Richard: But it’s worth a try, though. (Yes. Do not be dissuaded.)
Owen: Are there other alternative avenues that you might see that we might
pursue? (We have chosen to give this responsibility to you.)
Jean: Is there anything we can do to increase the possibility? (The invocations
as Sheariam has taught you.) Thank you. (And now I am going to usurp Sheariam’s
usual privilege and guide you in your meditation this night. (More thanks you’s.)
Silverthistle: Unburden your bodies. Put down your accouterments. Bring physical
balance into the physical parts of your vehicle. Breathe deeply.
Allow all tension to depart from you.
And now, with your powers of visualization, imagine being encapsulated in a
golden bubble. You can see out, and you can be seen from without. But you are safe.
You are secure within the golden bubble of the Divine Dewdrop. You are nestled in
the very bosom of God where there is perfect balance, perfect peace, perfect
understanding. And as you nestle within this golden globe, allow that globe to
extend to meet your neighbor’s.
And like bubbles, the bubble opens and all become one within one huge
golden bubble. In this Divine Breast there is no fear, only peace and joy. There is no
imperfection, only wholeness and replete-ness. The Divine Energy of Life flows
through you, flows throughout the bubble.
Let now that bubble expand and expand so that the Divine Idea of Life in
Earth moves to encircle the entire planet. And thus the Divine Idea serves all needs
everywhere for everyone. And yet your portion is not diminished. You have as much
as you ever had. As you go through your daily routines, whenever a concern should
arise, think again of this golden bubble. Allow yourselves to nestle within the bosom
of God, and know that the Divine Love conquers all.
And as you extend this sense of peace and wholeness around the world, those
about whom you have concern are served, served properly for their need, as only
the Divine knows the within of them. And so you are blessed, and you take this
blessing with you always. It dwells with you, and it is in you. And you share it by
being yourself.
And so I leave you now with my blessing, knowing that we are not separated.
We are always one in the Divine Golden Bubble. Bless you all and good night. (Many
good nights.)
|